Hot Environmental Topics

Go to your doctor and no matter how healthy you look, they take tests. Go to the dentist, and you get x-rays.  Regarding environmental issues again you need to test to verify nothing is present.  If you do not test you have a 100% chance of not finding anything.

Environmental Due Diligence is meant to protect a purchaser, commercial due diligence starts with a Phase I and can lead to a Phase II (testing), which while buyers are aware a Phase II is a possibility, it can also find a problem, so why do a Phase II if finding something is not 100% certain?

The map below which is from the 1940's shows an auto sales storefront in a downtown area.  It lists a 550 Gallon Gasoline UST in front of the building.  Today there are retail stores with a coffee lunch spot.  Really zero current evidence of anything automotive or gas tank related.    So, say you want to buy the property.  Do you assume the gas tank is not there anymore?  No, you scan the area by completing a GPR Survey to make sure it's gone and if it's still there you have owner remove the tank.  

How about below, a then and now photo?   Are the tanks still there?  Do you think if the gas tanks leaked, and you owned the property you would be responsible?

What if you find that the tank is gone, well you now take soil samples to make sure there is no residual contamination.   And yes if contamination is found, the property owner owns the problem.

People suspect a building component contains asbestos based on appearance and age of building, but you do not know 100% unless you test.  When you are doing a risk assessment or any other form of environmental due diligence, you would assume the component contains asbestos until proven otherwise.  The same goes for PCB's in an electrical transformer.  Assume it contains PCBs until it is labeled otherwise.   So, while a property owner wants to believe these is no contamination, a buyer can't rely on that belief.  Hence the need for a Phase I and sometimes a Phase II which includes testing.

A case in point an older manufacturing plant (40 years) had a large outdoor compressor.   The compressor at time of sale was only 5 years old, nice and new.   But as an environmental consultant we ask what about the old compressor.  The issue with compressors is they can spit oil and older compressors were known for this.  A REC in the Phase I would be to do a Phase II with soil testing around the 4 sides of the new compressor to look for residual oil from the old compressor.    Yep that is how it works.

We had a group looking to buy a large corner property that had commercial operations in  1930's that could contaminate the property.  The buyers were excited to buy the property.  From decades of experience, we recommended testing prior to purchase.  Their response is below

Thank you for submitting a proposal for our project. As you may know, your company is one of only a few that recommend taking soil samples for analysis.   Obviously, once the analysis is completed, the results would need to be disclosed. Shouldn’t a property owner be concerned that these soil samples might uncover a problem that would need to be addressed further?

Our answer is yes if you find contamination it is reportable and the responsibility of the current owner to pay for.   So there are reasons why a property owner may not want to have a buyer do testing.

If you are buying or selling real estate you need an experienced environmental consultant 0n your side, call the experts

Questions?  Call the experts 888-301-1050

There are inherent risks in life and in particular when you purchase something.   Warranties on products including cars are meant to balance the risk.  But when you buy a commercial property, you are buying more than the land and any improvements, you are buying any environmental issues past or present unless specified otherwise.  (There are sites that have government permitted contamination, that is a restriction on the property for sure. but it is s defined environmental liability). 

I am referring to the purchase of a property that has undiscovered environmental issues.  How you avoid buying a contaminated property is by performing Due Diligence such as a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.  More about Phase I ESA Click Here.

As this article states when should you be concerned about environmental issues on a commercial property?

The safe answer is on every commercial property that you have not completed your own due diligence.

Yes, that downtown property you want to buy may have been an auto garage, dry cleaner, part of a rail spur, I've seen tanneries (Tanneries are where animal hides are tanned, and the wastes generated from tanneries are considered a pollutant to the environment and has potential to pollute both soil and water because of the use toxic chemical constituents in the tanning process). 

The rub of downtown areas is they were the center of commerce, which can cause pollution long before environmental regulations became the norm.   Buying close to a rail line?  Well rail roads caused contamination and land was often built up with historic fill.  (Historic Fill material was commonly used to raise the topographic elevation of properties.    The fill material is composed of non-indigenous material… which may have been contaminated prior to emplacement and is in no way connected with the operations at the location of emplacement and which includes, without limitation, construction debris, dredge spoils, incinerator residue, demolition debris, fly ash, or non-hazardous solid waste). Because of the nature of its composition, historic fill material is a widespread concern for many property owners and potential property purchasers.    In short, the property can have at the time of placement legal contamination, which today is no longer legal.

Yes, none of this is fair.  There are other warning signs when you buy a commercial property even when you perform due diligence, I will run down a couple of items buyers should be concerned about.

1.  A Phase I includes interview and questionnaire with the owner who is typically the most knowledgeable party.    When this can't be accomplished you have important data gaps, which may be intentional on part of the seller.

2.   The owner has no prior environmental reports, meaning they didn't do their own Phase I or will not supply their report.  Want to know why an owner may not want to be interviewed for a Phase I, their lack of due diligence can be a driver.  

The historical map below shows auto sales at a downtown property, and it also lists 550 gallon gasoline tank in the street.  That tank and contamination belongs to the property and will only be known if you do due diligence. 

3.  The Phase I leads to a Phase II, which is testing and can absolutely open up a can of proverbial worms.  If you test you have a chance of finding a problem.  No testing?  Well 100% chance of finding nothing.  But the rub is when the owner denies or limits testing.  For example, we had a site where both soil and groundwater testing were warranted.  The owner did not want groundwater tested because the property had municipal water.  Groundwater is typically the 1st water bearing zone on a property, a good average is 16' to 20' deep.  You are not drinking this water ever, but if this water is contaminated, well it belongs to the owner.   My point being sellers will come up with some nugget of reason why we do not need to test, which is irrelevant in the context of environmental due diligence.

4.   Owner provides reason why due diligence is irrelevant (remember buyer pays for the work not the seller).  Case in point client buying a former appliance store, which was a former laundromat.   Seller wanted no testing because refrigerators and microwaves are not an issue and a laundromat, well that's just dirty cloths.  Fast forward we test groundwater water and find dry cleaning solvents.  Conclusion, the laundromat did dry cleaning.  Saved our client $165,000.

Commercial Property Purchase Pro Tips

Start your due diligence and do not consider Due Diligence to be a hand stamp, because if you find an issue it will take time address it.

Understand that your proposed settlement date was likely set PRIOR to performing Due Diligence.  When Due Diligence finds an issue settlement could be pushed back weeks, months even years. 

Expert Environmental Advice 888-301-1050

Due Diligence and the Innocent Landowner Defense

The experienced and well informed know that due diligence is an important and common practice when purchasing real estate.  The advantage of due diligence and conversely not performing due diligence can best be compared to the saying "you break it, you buy it".  In real estate terms if you buy a property that has an environmental issue (broken) that you were not aware of prior to purchase, you own it and the issue is yours to pay for no matter the cost or value of the real estate.

For example a couple received an inheritance from a relative, the money's were substantial enough for the couple to realize a dream of buying and operating an automotive garage.  This dream was achieved by buying a garage cash from a fellow who was retiring.  They were able to buy the land and tools for approximately $100,000.00. (As a side note the lower the value of the property, the more risk there is that an environmental issue can be a large percentage of the property price. I say this as time and again prospective buyers defer a Phase I as the purchase price is low).   They used an attorney for the paperwork, but no bank was involved.  While the attorney advised of performing a Phase I, the buyers were not concerned and did not want to derail the deal for something they saw as a waste of time and money.   Couple buys property, run the garage for three years and then husband develops health concerns limiting physical activity such as working on cars.  Couple list property for sale, potential buyer finds property and decides to buy it.  Buyer goes to bank, as he is not able to pay cash as the current owner did.  Bank does phase I, finds issues leading to a phase II. Phase II finds oils in ground from garage operations. Buyer requires owner to remediate, owners say not their problem and are selling as is.  

Deal falls through, owner now paying money from retirement to cleanup the problem.  Buyer is gone, garage is closed and owners are spending 50% of what they paid to cleanup the site. 

Can the owners claim an innocent landowner defense?  

No, the innocent landowner defense is based upon a party purchasing a property and having no knowledge of contamination at time of purchase. A buyer must perform an all appropriate inquiries (AAI) prior to purchase to begin to have this defense.

What does an All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) inquiry entail?

Completion of a Phase I ESA as per

1. All Appropriate Inquiries

“All appropriate inquiries” refers to the process of evaluating a property’s environmental conditions and assessing potential liability for contamination either past or present.  This applies to any party seeking to assert protection from CERCLA liability as an innocent landowner, or a bona fide prospective purchaser, or a contiguous property owner. 

In 2002 Brownfields Amendments were set forth requiring the EPA to establish regulations establishing standards and practices for conducting all appropriate inquiries. These practices were meant to include research into the previous ownership and uses of a property necessary to qualify for certain landowner liability protections. 

November 1, 2005, the EPA published in the Federal Register its final rule entitled “Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries,” in which it declared that the American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) E1527-05 standard, entitled “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process,” can be used to comply with the provisions of the rule.  The standards and practices constituting “all appropriate inquiries” are set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 312.

What is included in the All Appropriate Inquiries?

1. Must be conducted or updated within one year of acquiring ownership of a property. 
2. Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and occupants, the review of government records, visual site inspections, and searches for environmental cleanup liens, must be conducted or updated within 180 days prior to acquiring ownership of the property.
3. An environmental professional must conduct or oversee the conduct of activities required by the all-appropriate inquiry rule. 
4. The environmental professional must conduct the following inquiry activities:

• Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and occupants of the facility for the purpose of gathering information regarding the potential for contamination at the facility;
• Reviews of historical sources, such as chain of title documents, aerial photographs, building department records, and land use records, to determine previous uses and occupancies of the real property since the property was first developed;
• Reviews of Federal, State, and local government records, waste disposal records, underground storage tank records, and hazardous waste handling, generation, treatment, disposal, and spill records, concerning contamination at or near the facility;
• Walking inspections of the site and of adjoining properties;
• Assessments of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property; and
• Assessments of the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate inspection.
• 5 Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens against the site that are filed under Federal, State, or local law.

6. Assessments of specialized knowledge or experience on the part of the prospective landowner.
7. The relationship of the purchase price to the value of the property, if the property was not contaminated.

An innocent landowner defense also extends to the operation and maintenance of the site after purchase. Once the property is owned the new owner must take reasonable steps to stop any continuing release, prevent any future release, and prevent or limit human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to any previously released hazardous substances. The owner must also cooperate, provide assistance, and allow access to persons to conduct response actions or natural resource restoration at the site. Owners must maintain any and all land use restrictions and not degrade the effectiveness of institutional controls.

Additional responsibilities cover cooperating with requests and administrative subpoenas concerning the facility and follow through with all legally required notices (public notification and government) regarding the discovery or release of any hazardous substances at the facility.

Lastly to comply with AAI, the purchaser cannot be associated/affiliated with any other potentially responsible party through any direct or indirect familial relationship, or any contractual, corporate, or financial relationship (excluding relationships created by instruments conveying or financing title or by contracts for the sale of goods or services).

Bottom line the new owner has to be able to prove that the environmental contamination damages were caused by a third party with whom the new owner does not have an employment, agency, or contractual relationship, as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 9601(35).

Buyers beware and perform your due diligence so you know before you buy?