Hot Environmental Topics

Do not misuse the term Phase I

A Phase I ESA (Environmental Site Assessment) is historical research on a property, typically commercial that looks for potential environmental impairment to the property.   No testing or remediation is performed in a Phase I.  A Phase II is all about testing and a Phase III is Remediation. 

The map below is of a long-since-developed site, that in the map was a train turnaround.  Trains are notorious for oil leaks and spills, surely a train turnaround such as this would hold legacy contamination that an unsuspecting property owner could be inheriting if they did not complete a Phase I.

Regarding testing, no Phase I is required to test, A Phase I identifies areas that could require testing.  Case in point, the photo below shows a storage tank on its side.   There is a concern because anything stored in the tank could have leaked out because the tank is on its side.  There would be a recommendation in a Phase I to test the soil around the tank.   But no testing is completed during the Phase I, that is left for Phase II.

You can't skip a Phase I and go to a Phase II as the Phase I is your road map of what to inspect. 

The most common misuse of the term Phase I is from residential home inspections.

We are commonly called to do an inspection of a property after a Home Inspection is performed.   It is not uncommon that the home inspector notices evidence of mold, or some other environmental hazard such as a former oil heat, and recommends further evaluation, which is prudent and warranted for sure.   But when a Phase I is recommended, it shows a clear misunderstanding of what a Phase I ESA actually is.

Here is an exert from such a report

"Underground Fuel Tanks Noted:
The evidence noted is the presence of either a fuel tank fill pipe or a fuel tank breather pipe at the referenced location. There is evidence of an underground fuel tank installed on the property. Further investigation is required to determine the condition of the tank as well as the presence of any leakage into the soil. A Phase 1 environmental audit of the subject property is recommended to determine the presence and/or condition of the underground oil tank and to see if other environmental hazards are present. The soil should be evaluated, and the tank should be pressure tested. Permanent removal of the underground storage tank should be considered. They do not leave fill pipes behind if the tank was removed. There is no evidence an oil tank was located in the basement.

A Phase I ESA follows ASTM protocol for historical research of a property, 99% of the time it’s performed on commercial not residential, unless multi-family.

A Phase I is meant to identify the potential for contamination of a site by hazardous or toxic materials and to identify other possible environmental constraints on the site. It is not meant to be a detailed, comprehensive investigation based on quantitative or qualitative analytical data. No environmental sampling and analysis will be performed under the Phase I scope of work. The form and content of this ESA I will follow the form and content as outlined in ASTM standard E 1527-21. The results of the Phase I ESA will be used to determine whether or not further study (such as a Phase II ESA) is warranted, based on the background information gathered and the results of the site inspection.

https://www.currenenvironmental.com/blog/why-a-phase-i-is-important

Have Phase I Questions? Call the Experts

888-301-1050

Phase I is the foundation of due diligence when buying a property. Phase I environmental audits are so important for purchasers of commercial real estate. Environmental regulation places the burden of environmental cleanup on a property owner.  If contamination occurred at a property 40 years ago and 5 owners ago, regardless of who owned the property in the past, the current property owner is the Responsible Party for the cleanup. 

Short story, a professional firm, was closed over a weekend.  When employees returned on Monday, they found a 14,000-gallon tank in their parking lot.  The tank was dumped there over the weekend.  This dumping was reported to the police and security cameras caught the entire process, unfortunately, the cameras could not decipher the license plate.  The bottom line the property owner had to pay to properly dispose of the dumped tank. 

That said, how do you know you are getting the best Phase I?

The environmental company should express that the  Phase I can be completed within 3 weeks on average.   Longer time frames would occur if there are government records (environmental reports at the State) that must be reviewed which can take three (3) more weeks to access.  You, as the client, need to be told that Phase I may not be able to be completed as fast as you would like, which many environmental consultants do not want to address.

Quick Story

Environmental company out of Buffalo, NY, did a Phase I at a property in Southern, NJ for an SBA loan.  Timing was mission critical, Phase I report was completed but it had a large data gap, as their recommendation below states:

Recommendations
Additional investigation is warranted to assess the on-site subsurface conditions due to the potential for on-site USTs and long term automotive repair, and should include the area of the floor drain/sump discharge and former in-ground lifts. A review of the 2016 NJDEP Case may help reduce the scope of work. Nevertheless, if investigation identifies a concern, further investigation/remedial work may be required.

Reading between the lines here the consultant knew there were reports with NJDEP but did not review them as they had to complete the Phase I in a short time frame.  Fact, the Phase I was not complete and should not have been issued until the State files were reviewed. Now the consultant wants more money to review files that should have been reviewed as part of the Phase I.  This is very common and wrong on many levels.

Your takeaway should be that you have to be provided realistic time frames to complete the Phase I.

It is estimated 70% of Phase I's require some form of a Phase II.  Now understand that while a Phase I could be classified as white collar, a Phase II will include an aspect of blue-collar work.  Most environmental consultant do not staff people or equipment necessary to perform a Phase II.  Many Phase I customers end up getting hit with the markup from subcontractors that consultants utilize for the Phase I.  You also get wacked with dealing with a 3rd party schedule.

Quick Story

Curren completed a Phase I for a business and property being sold.  Phase I found contamination, buyers bought the site and one of the partners had a friend that worked at another environmental company, that took over the management of the contamination post purchase.  The rub was the friend's company, owned no equipment and subcontracted everything and they had fallen into and out of bankruptcy several years ago and had a long list of vendors they never paid.  Curren Environmental got called back to supply equipment for the investigation and remediation of the site, only Curren couldn't extend credit to the environmental company due to their prior bankruptcy.  The buyer had to pay for all our work which the partners questioned why they switched companies in the first place.  I think their biggest concern was the financial health of the company they hired.

The lesson here is hiring a company that covers tasks of Phase I, II & III, can make your project smoother.

3    Ask the consultant to Predict Your Future

• When you hire a company for environmental you want experience.   The more you know the better you are at evaluating  risk.
• Buying a farm = GPR for tanks, past farmer dumping and pesticide contamination.
• Buying a gas station = former tanks
• Buying a strip mall = any past tenants that could cause contamination?
• Industrial Land = What operated there? Manufacture companies and waste generation.
• Buying land to redevelop = Any off-site contamination concerns that could affect your development
• Known Contaminated Site = what has been done and how viable is owner of value of land vs contamination

If you give us the site address and some prior history, the crystal ball can go to work to prep you for what could be in store for you.    This is often bad news and potential negative issues that could affect the transaction, but topics that you should be aware of during your due diligence.  This may even deter you from proceeding with the purchase.

Expert Environmental Advice for over 25 Years

856-858-9509

What are appropriate Due Diligence time frames?

One of the most common issues in buying and selling real estate is unrealistic due diligence time frames & settlement dates.  Settlement dates that are set PRIOR to any due diligence being completed is the biggest failure. If you are involved in real estate and the due diligence finds an Area of Concern (AOC) or a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) 80% of the time the settlement date needs to be pushed back.

Quick example, completed Phase I ESAs for a site in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, both found potential USTs. Both required a geophysical, at one of the sites the property owner of 29 years swore there were no tanks, but they had zero paperwork to support that statement. Fast forward three (3) tanks were found between the two sites. Now you have to get NJDEP & PADEP permits and register the regulated tanks, both sites took about 50 days to get government permits.

Understand that Due Diligence has Many Layers and steps.

Take for example a farm being purchased that required a Phase I ESA, the due diligence period was set for 30 days with settlement on the 31st day.   The concern of the parties was whether the Phase I could be completed in 30 days, 90% of the time it can be, for the record most Phase I's can be completed in 2 weeks, sometimes 3 weeks.    But the real issue is the parties left no time for a Phase II, if required, and most all farms would require some form of a Phase II and that's coming from 30 years of experience.  Even if you tell people testing is likely going to be recommended, no one listens and no one extends the due diligence period, but everyone gets upset when they have to change the settlement date. Sure the seller could have done their own Phase I & II prior to selling the property and saved time and headache, unfortunately, few sellers are that forward thinking.

Let’s say, a property has had remediation completed, and multiple areas on a property were remediated. We just had a site that fits that bill.   A Phase I is still completed to protect the buyer but the Phase I has to review state environmental reports that were submitted, which can take 4 weeks to get copies of reports.  (Fact most owners have incomplete reports or cannot find the reports).   Obtaining records from the government is not quick and yes a one (1) month wait is not uncommon.  The 4-week due diligence period must be extended.  

On the site we just dealt with, which was commercial, it was disclosed that multiple AOCs had been remediated and closed out with the state.  But this site had other areas that were not remediated that warranted testing, multiple, like $42,000 worth of testing.  Granted the property was 10.7 acres, listed for close to 3 million dollars, so it should not be surprising that AOCs existed on the property and were not evaluated by the seller, I mean few people who own real estate want to find a problem. The buyer still wanted to proceed with testing and purchase, and the seller did.  Well, the seller ended the contract, they were concerned problems would be found they would have to address.  Now, did the seller side warn them that this scenario was possible, hard to say but I would venture a guess the answer is no.  Is the seller wise in thinking another buyer will come along to buy the property without testing? They can hope but are unlikely.  The buyer was more than upset that a deal valued in the millions would be stopped in its tracks due to their desire to test and ensure they were not buying a contaminated property.  The buyer also was willing to contribute to some amount of remediation.  

But let’s say the deal kept moving forward and the seller gave another 30 days of due diligence.  The testing could be completed in this 30-day window, but if remediation was warranted, 30 days is not enough.   But the seller says we can price out cleanup and negotiate a price reduction within 30 days.   Still an epic unrealistic situation as Phase II is just evaluating if contamination is present not the extent.  Say three areas out of 14 need remediation (an unrealistic low number but just play it out).    Your next step is to define the 4 areas which could take another 30 days maybe 90 depending on soil and groundwater.   This situation actually played out on another site and the due diligence was 9 and 1/2 months.

Pro Tip

All you bankers, real estate professionals, sellers, buyers, and lawyers listen up.  Ask your environmental professional what they would estimate for a reasonable due diligence, when a Phase I & II may be necessary.  Before you ask do not give them your desired date of settlement, you will likely bias their answer. Although as environmental professionals we are not clairvoyant, we can assess sites from a desk, and utilize experience from other sites we have evaluated many times before to say you may want to budget 60 days or 90 days, if it's less, well then you can settle sooner.  You should also consider if any cost sharing will occur with Phase II between buyer and seller and what the seller's pain point is on paying for remediation.   

For example, the client had a retail strip of stores with historic groundwater contamination. The economical solution was to monitor the groundwater for 8 quarters to show a declining trend and permit the contamination in place.    The 2-year budget was $86,000, which was also the amount the seller was willing to place in escrow after the sale for the buyer to use to pay for the work. But the $86,000 was a budget and could trend higher or lower.   This confused the buyer as well as the fact that there would be costs after the site is signed off that the owner would be responsible for and this is assuming groundwater trends lower. Some sites do not and you need to perform remediation to push levels lower.   This is another situation where all parties were not transparent regarding time frames and costs and what each party was willing to accept.

Last example and let me dumb this down for you.  

A residence had a leaking tank, which was discovered during due diligence.  The future cost of remediation was determined, what was not discussed was the time frame to remediate and when state would review and sign off (typically 2 weeks to 6 weeks to 2 months, depending on your state).     Well at settlement these time frames were discussed and the buyer backed out at the settlement table.  Now the blame on this one was the environmental company not timelining the remediation (parties not asking either).   People went in with blinders on and the deal fell apart.

If your due diligence finds environmental concerns, know that environmental has no drive-through lane, no same-day delivery, heck not even a delivery date.  Like medicine and law, it’s a practice, a somewhat inexact science, but data sets are out there if you are willing to listen.  So rather than say due diligence is 30 days, ask what the consultant thinks is the reasonable time frame.   Play out a couple of scenarios so all parties have an idea of what could happen, plan for the worst, and hope for the best.

Due Diligence Questions?

888-301-1050

Go to your doctor and no matter how healthy you look, they take tests. Go to the dentist, and you get x-rays.  Regarding environmental issues again you need to test to verify nothing is present.  If you do not test you have a 100% chance of not finding anything.

Environmental Due Diligence is meant to protect a purchaser, commercial due diligence starts with a Phase I and can lead to a Phase II (testing), which while buyers are aware a Phase II is a possibility, it can also find a problem, so why do a Phase II if finding something is not 100% certain?

The map below which is from the 1940's shows an auto sales storefront in a downtown area.  It lists a 550 Gallon Gasoline UST in front of the building.  Today there are retail stores with a coffee lunch spot.  Really zero current evidence of anything automotive or gas tank related.    So, say you want to buy the property.  Do you assume the gas tank is not there anymore?  No, you scan the area by completing a GPR Survey to make sure it's gone and if it's still there you have owner remove the tank.  

How about below, a then and now photo?   Are the tanks still there?  Do you think if the gas tanks leaked, and you owned the property you would be responsible?

What if you find that the tank is gone, well you now take soil samples to make sure there is no residual contamination.   And yes if contamination is found, the property owner owns the problem.

People suspect a building component contains asbestos based on appearance and age of building, but you do not know 100% unless you test.  When you are doing a risk assessment or any other form of environmental due diligence, you would assume the component contains asbestos until proven otherwise.  The same goes for PCB's in an electrical transformer.  Assume it contains PCBs until it is labeled otherwise.   So, while a property owner wants to believe these is no contamination, a buyer can't rely on that belief.  Hence the need for a Phase I and sometimes a Phase II which includes testing.

A case in point an older manufacturing plant (40 years) had a large outdoor compressor.   The compressor at time of sale was only 5 years old, nice and new.   But as an environmental consultant we ask what about the old compressor.  The issue with compressors is they can spit oil and older compressors were known for this.  A REC in the Phase I would be to do a Phase II with soil testing around the 4 sides of the new compressor to look for residual oil from the old compressor.    Yep that is how it works.

We had a group looking to buy a large corner property that had commercial operations in  1930's that could contaminate the property.  The buyers were excited to buy the property.  From decades of experience, we recommended testing prior to purchase.  Their response is below

Thank you for submitting a proposal for our project. As you may know, your company is one of only a few that recommend taking soil samples for analysis.   Obviously, once the analysis is completed, the results would need to be disclosed. Shouldn’t a property owner be concerned that these soil samples might uncover a problem that would need to be addressed further?

Our answer is yes if you find contamination it is reportable and the responsibility of the current owner to pay for.   So there are reasons why a property owner may not want to have a buyer do testing.

If you are buying or selling real estate you need an experienced environmental consultant 0n your side, call the experts

Questions?  Call the experts 888-301-1050

There are inherent risks in life and in particular when you purchase something.   Warranties on products including cars are meant to balance the risk.  But when you buy a commercial property, you are buying more than the land and any improvements, you are buying any environmental issues past or present unless specified otherwise.  (There are sites that have government permitted contamination, that is a restriction on the property for sure. but it is s defined environmental liability). 

I am referring to the purchase of a property that has undiscovered environmental issues.  How you avoid buying a contaminated property is by performing Due Diligence such as a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.  More about Phase I ESA Click Here.

As this article states when should you be concerned about environmental issues on a commercial property?

The safe answer is on every commercial property that you have not completed your own due diligence.

Yes, that downtown property you want to buy may have been an auto garage, dry cleaner, part of a rail spur, I've seen tanneries (Tanneries are where animal hides are tanned, and the wastes generated from tanneries are considered a pollutant to the environment and has potential to pollute both soil and water because of the use toxic chemical constituents in the tanning process). 

The rub of downtown areas is they were the center of commerce, which can cause pollution long before environmental regulations became the norm.   Buying close to a rail line?  Well rail roads caused contamination and land was often built up with historic fill.  (Historic Fill material was commonly used to raise the topographic elevation of properties.    The fill material is composed of non-indigenous material… which may have been contaminated prior to emplacement and is in no way connected with the operations at the location of emplacement and which includes, without limitation, construction debris, dredge spoils, incinerator residue, demolition debris, fly ash, or non-hazardous solid waste). Because of the nature of its composition, historic fill material is a widespread concern for many property owners and potential property purchasers.    In short, the property can have at the time of placement legal contamination, which today is no longer legal.

Yes, none of this is fair.  There are other warning signs when you buy a commercial property even when you perform due diligence, I will run down a couple of items buyers should be concerned about.

1.  A Phase I includes interview and questionnaire with the owner who is typically the most knowledgeable party.    When this can't be accomplished you have important data gaps, which may be intentional on part of the seller.

2.   The owner has no prior environmental reports, meaning they didn't do their own Phase I or will not supply their report.  Want to know why an owner may not want to be interviewed for a Phase I, their lack of due diligence can be a driver.  

The historical map below shows auto sales at a downtown property, and it also lists 550 gallon gasoline tank in the street.  That tank and contamination belongs to the property and will only be known if you do due diligence. 

3.  The Phase I leads to a Phase II, which is testing and can absolutely open up a can of proverbial worms.  If you test you have a chance of finding a problem.  No testing?  Well 100% chance of finding nothing.  But the rub is when the owner denies or limits testing.  For example, we had a site where both soil and groundwater testing were warranted.  The owner did not want groundwater tested because the property had municipal water.  Groundwater is typically the 1st water bearing zone on a property, a good average is 16' to 20' deep.  You are not drinking this water ever, but if this water is contaminated, well it belongs to the owner.   My point being sellers will come up with some nugget of reason why we do not need to test, which is irrelevant in the context of environmental due diligence.

4.   Owner provides reason why due diligence is irrelevant (remember buyer pays for the work not the seller).  Case in point client buying a former appliance store, which was a former laundromat.   Seller wanted no testing because refrigerators and microwaves are not an issue and a laundromat, well that's just dirty cloths.  Fast forward we test groundwater water and find dry cleaning solvents.  Conclusion, the laundromat did dry cleaning.  Saved our client $165,000.

Commercial Property Purchase Pro Tips

Start your due diligence and do not consider Due Diligence to be a hand stamp, because if you find an issue it will take time address it.

Understand that your proposed settlement date was likely set PRIOR to performing Due Diligence.  When Due Diligence finds an issue settlement could be pushed back weeks, months even years. 

Expert Environmental Advice 888-301-1050

You break it you buy it.  Look before you leap.  You only have yourself to blame.  All common phrases.  Well environmental due diligence, i.e., a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is an insurance policy of sorts that protects buyers of commercial properties.  Phase I is a historical and current assessment of a property for environmental issues (read costs to remediate contamination on a property).   But there are two "rubs" when doing a Phase I.  First, no buyer wants to find a problem with the property they are buying (trust me, I have heard clients say they hope we don't find anything countless times).  I call these people Hand Stampers because they want to get stamped that they did a Phase I and nothing was found, I call it unrealistic.   Do you think testing was required in the below photo?  The answer is yes.

The second rub of Phase I is that some 80% of the time, a Phase I is needed, apartment buildings much lower percent.   When Phase II testing is necessary the buyers are surprised by Phase II cost and the cost disparities (when they have time to price shop).  The rub is that a Phase I is 100% office work, a Phase II requires that same Phase I person, but now you are dealing with the environmental trades that 90% of environmental consultants subcontract out.  These Phase II services include Geophysical Surveys,  (GPR), and drilling (that's how you collect soil and groundwater samples). and perhaps excavation for test pits or removal of contamination (which technically is Phase III).   

All these services get marked up by the consultant.  You have to understand that consultants have insurance and workers comp that lists them as clerical, which is a very inexpensive insurance rating, most can't even use a shovel or it can place their personnel into a different workers comp rating which is more expensive.   So most all consultants subcontract services and markup the subcontractor, who does the heavy lifting so to speak.

We were asked to quote a Phase II for a buyer.   Our Phase II  cost was $3,500.00 and basically involved investigating locations where tanks were removed without testing.  The company that did the Phase I quoted the Phase II at  $7,800.00  the $4,300.00 difference represents the consultant's markup and recouping expenses from doing a discounted Phase I, Curren sees this discrepancy all the time.  Our client asked why the price differential, which I just explained to you and they said we should let more people know,  hence why you are reading this article.

Now, why would I want to let you know that consultants discount Phase I's knowing they will make it up on the Phase II work.   Well our recent client, who now has hired us for another property they are purchasing (Phase I), said we should.     

Curren Environmental could be considered a boutique or full-service company as we do the consulting and the environmental contracting (heavy lifting).   We find clients like being able to deal with one company and of course the financial savings.

Do you have Phase II Questions?

Call the experts

888-301-1050

SBA 2018 CHANGES TO THE PHASE I & II

SBA SOP 50 10 5 (J)

(Phase One Environmental Site Assessment & Phase II Investigation)

As of January 1, 2018, the SBA has changed their environmental due diligence requirements.  These changes relate to Phase I ESA's completed and Phase II requirements for certain sites applying for SBA funding.  The changes are more conservative and reflect SBA experience with Due Diligence completed and the need for stricter standards.

January 1, 2018 marks the effective date of SBA SOP 50 10 5 (J) relative to Phase I and II requirements.    These new requirements must be followed by parties going through SBA lending.  The Nine Key Areas of the most important changes are as follows:

1. Dry Cleaner Requirements
2. Gas Stations
3. Records Search with Risk Assessment
4. Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Recommendations
5. Shelf Life of a Phase I
6. Reliance Letters
7. NACIS Code List
8. Historic Places
9. Insurance

1.       Drycleaners

If lending occurs to any site where dry cleaning was EVER performed then a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Phase II ESA must be performed.   This is a change to the prior requirement where  the SOP only required a Phase I ESA for current or former dry-cleaning operations and the Phase II was not necessary is if prior dry cleaning operations were under 5 years.  Now if the target site has current or former onsite dry-cleaning facilities that used, likely used or uses chlorinated and/or petroleum-based solvents a Phase II is mandatory.  If the Phase II ESA finds any soil and groundwater contamination and soil vapor intrusion, it must be addressed.

2.      Gasoline Service Stations

The Environmental professional must document with professional judgement that the facility complies with all regulatory requirements relating to tank and equipment testing i.e. the tank system.

The SBA loan will not be completed until full compliance is achieved, and deficiencies have been corrected, which would require monetary outlay by the borrower.  

3.      Records Search with Risk Assessment

In a Records Search with Risk Assessment (RSRA), historical sources, regulatory databases and an environmental questionnaire are used to determine current and historical uses of a property in order to provide a risk determination. Site reconnaissance activities are not part of a RSRA. The new SOP has additional requirements for the historical sources used in a RSRA. The historical records should identify property uses back to the first developed use or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. In addition, the RSRA should include the database reports and historical records used to develop the opinion noted in the RSRA.

4.           Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) Recommendations

Any Phase I ESA will include a conclusion by the Environmental Professional whether there is risk of contamination so minimal that no further investigation is warranted or that sufficient risk warranting additional investigation is present. Recommendations, including Housekeeping recommendations of the Environmental Professional’s recommendations are to be followed.  In short, if further work is recommended, it is to be accomplished.  Noncompliance requires the party to provide to the SBA Environmental Committee justification for not wanting to follow the recommendations of the Environmental Professional, which requires review and approval or denial from the SBA Environmental Committee.

 5.       Shelf Life of a Phase I

SBA will accept an All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) compliant Phase I if it was performed within one year of submittal to the SBA. The prior version of the SOP had a 180-day limit.

 6.       Reliance Letters

Reliance letters are required for Transaction Screen Reports, Phase I ESAs and Phase II ESAs. The SBA Reliance Letter template cannot be modified.  Lender and CD’s are not supposed to alter the terms of the SBA’s standard reliance letter.

7.        NACIS Code List

The NAICS code(s) for the Property’s current and known prior uses must be obtained or a good faith effort exerted to obtain the number(a) and a comparison must be made to the NAICS code(s) to the list of environmentally sensitive industries. Two new categories were added and four were amended.   The NACIS can trigger a Phase II:

• 484 – Trucking (if service bays, truck washing or fuel tanks are present)
• 713990 – Other recreational industry (indoor and outdoor shooting ranges only)

In addition, four clarifications were added. The clarifications are noted below.

• 316 – Leather & Allied Product Manufacturing (not required if assembly only)
• 326 – Plastics & Rubber Product Manufacturing (not required if assembly only)
• 332 – Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing (not required if assembly only)
• 8122 – Death Care Services (unless no embalming or cremation at the property.

8.     Historic Places

Potential to impact listed/eligible to be listed properties on the NRHP, the SBA counsel should be consulted. If impacts to historic places are anticipated, the SBA is required to consult with the applicable State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), who typically has 30 days to provide feedback on the property. If no impacts are anticipated, the SBA counsel may determine that no further review is required.

9.       Insurance

A new section relating to Indemnification was added to the Environmental Policies and Procedures section of the SBA SOP. Environmental errors and omissions liability insurance with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 per claim (or occurrence) must be provided and that evidence of this insurance must be attached to all reports. This insurance must cover environmental work completed as of the date of the Phase I, provide coverage up to $1,00,000.00 and have no time limitation on liability.

Trust the Experts our Due Diligence Experience is Decades in the Making.

1. Over 20 years experience.
2. Thousands of Phase I & II ESA completed.
3. Peer reviews performed on Phase I & II reports.
4. In house Drilling, Geophysical & Excavation equipment for cost control.

 Any purchaser of commercial real estate is performing Phase I due diligence to protect their interest, not is once again not typically fulfilling a requirement of the law.  Due diligence is a prudent practice to follow for any commercial purchaser.   Many buyers contact our office with little to no real knowledge of what a Phase I is and are being directed to perform one by their attorney or realtor.  Many people view a Phase I as getting their hand stamped and the quicker the better so the transaction can go to settlement.  The due diligence aspect is many times an afterthought.

We are going to cover the different scenarios when a Phase I is completed and when a Phase II or III is triggered and why that is a good thing.

The best possible outcome for all parties after completing a Phase I, in the eyes of a buyer or seller is that the Phase I finds no issues with the site and accordingly there are no recommendations that any additional work is required such as a Phase II or Phase III.   This is not as common an outcome as many people think or expect.  Sellers do not want you to complete a Phase I as it delays the settlement and opens up the possibility that the Phase I may find an issue.   Buyers do not want a Phase I performed for the same reasons, citing the time it took to find the perfect site at the right price as well as monies already spent to date.  The Phase I is viewed as a necessary evil and one that at best could cost money and delay the sale from 2 to 6 weeks and at worst strike a crushing blow to the sale when a problem is uncovered that the owner was unaware of and unable or unwilling to address.

The odds that the Phase I will come back clean, meaning no RECs are found, is based on numerous factors including the date of site development and historical usage of the site.  We have found that some of the most innocuous appearing sites (upholstery and insurance office), have been found to have potential environmental concerns from PRIOR usage.

A common Phase I situation is a client that is not required to perform a Phase I by the bank either because the loan amount is not triggering it or they are paying cash or there is a 1031 exchange.  These are rush hand stamped Phase I’s as there are already planned deadlines and the Phase I request is coming from the buyers attorney.  The rush part of the Phase I need is not based on anything pertinent relative to environmental conditions, but rather business or financial needs.   This is where hand stamping is most common.   Timing is relative and the sooner a decision is made on performing the Phase I the faster it will be completed.  In a perfect world a Phase I would be initiated by the seller prior to listing the property for sale.  In practice, it is one of the last things a buyer completes.

Time necessary to complete a Phase I varies.  Most Phase I’s are completed within three weeks, some can take as long as 6 to 8 weeks.  The difference in timing is based on the presence of records at the State and local levels.  The presence of files for a site at an environmental agency is typically unknown until a Phase I is initiated and the agencies are contacted regarding any files.  If files are found, the review of reasonably ascertainable files is required.  There could be a multiple week wait to get access to these files as they may be in storage or the first available date the State gives is 4 weeks away.   The time to access environmental files at a State level is the under looked aspect of a Phase I.  The determination that no files exist allows the Phase I process to be expedited.  The presence of environmentally-associated records indicates that investigation/remediation work may have been initiated or completed.  Records must be reviewed by a person with the experience and knowledge of applicable regulations to confirm that investigations/remediation has been completed in accordance with the local, State and Federal regulations.  A recent Phase I had pertinent files that were at the State.  Based on ability to accumulate the records and schedule the first available review date, it took five weeks to just perform a cursory review.  The review found that the site was formerly a gas station and had gas tanks removed and properly closed though the State.  What the file review did not indicate was the presence of other tanks on the site that appeared to have been either removed or left in place.  The unknown tanks consisted of a heating oil, waste oil and kerosene tank.   This triggered the need for a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey of the site to search for the possible missing tanks.  In this case, the buyer was sure that all the tanks were removed and signed off by the State, unfortunately that was not the case.  In this case, the buyer did not buy the site and the owner had more work to complete including the removal of the tanks.

Questions?  

When you start a Phase I, anticipate that a Phase II may be the necessary.  A Phase II is testing or further invasive evaluation of a suspected environmental concern.   Another Phase I performed found the need to complete soil borings on the site in areas where the operations of the site may have allowed historical seepage of oils and chemicals into the soil.  The Phase II did indeed find contamination in all the borings completed.   At this point the purchaser was into the property for over 20K, which including attorney’s fees, zoning applications, engineering and environmental.  The next step after finding an area of contamination is to determine the extent of contamination and the associated costs for remediation.  This added weeks upon weeks to the financial deal which could lead to the potential purchaser to look for another property weighed against the monies spent to date.  Most contracts allow the buyer or seller to back out of the transaction if repair expenses exceed a dollar amount or a time limit.   Usually at this point the buyer, thinking they were buying a clean site, is upset about monies thrown down the drain and when the end will occur.   Rarely does the purchaser weigh the fact that the Phase I did exactly what it was designed to do which is evaluate for potential environmental issues that could devalue the site.   Slightly less than $100,000.00, later and almost 7 months from the start of the Phase I was the property cleaned up.  The buyer dodged a remediation expense that surely would have been in their lap if the property was bought without a Phase I as the party they sell too would most likely not be as foolish to purchase without performing Due Diligence.

The photo below is a drum storage area, the floor below the wood was heavily stained.  It was flagged in the Phase I as an AOC and testing was recommended and the testing found contamination.

Phase I cost sharing.  Due to the unexpected outcome of any Phase I’s in some instances the expense of the Phase I is shared between buyers and sellers.  The advantage for both parties it not just financial (50/50 split), but ownership of the report.  If the transaction falls apart for reasons other than environmental finds issues, the owner has possession of the report and can share same with the next prospective purchaser.

Phase II cost sharing is more complicated.  The Phase II by definition involves physical examinations and in many cases testing.  Phases II expenses can dwarf the cost of a Phase II and due to the potential of finding an issue, many sellers would prefer the testing not be performed.  This is particularly common when the issues being investigated relate to potential conditions that predate the current owner.  This is a very common situation if the current owner purchased the site in the last 20 years and did not perform a Phase I.  Cost sharing is again valuable as the owner has rights to the report and data generated by the Phase II.   In most cases if the Phase II finds an issue that must be addressed or remediated (Phase III) the phase II has to be shared with the owner to document the findings.   Phase I cost sharing is far more common than in Phase II situation.